<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coldplay and Bluespamming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2005/08/04/coldplay-and-bluespamming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2005/08/04/coldplay-and-bluespamming/</link>
	<description>Russell Buckley and Carlo Longino on mobile technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 09:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Butcher</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2005/08/04/coldplay-and-bluespamming/comment-page-1/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Butcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://p6.hostingprod.com/@mobhappy.com/blog1/?p=521#comment-812</guid>
		<description>Parlophone, and just about every other record label, are quite happy to condone &quot;illegal activity&quot; in the form of flypostering - so long as it&#039;s by third party agencies who can&#039;t be linked back to to the source. Bluecasting, I would hazard, is set to be the next form of &quot;digital flyposting&quot;, especially now that authorities in London (for instance) have decided to crack down on the physical stuff. Knowing how flyposting tends to blight already run-down and poor areas, I should think the mild inconvenience of the odd &quot;blucast&quot; message is quite a bit preferable to having your environment trashed with old posters (which become litter). Expecially as you can simply change your phone&#039;s name, or just block the sender. But yes, it&#039;s still spamming, blah blah...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parlophone, and just about every other record label, are quite happy to condone &#8220;illegal activity&#8221; in the form of flypostering &#8211; so long as it&#8217;s by third party agencies who can&#8217;t be linked back to to the source. Bluecasting, I would hazard, is set to be the next form of &#8220;digital flyposting&#8221;, especially now that authorities in London (for instance) have decided to crack down on the physical stuff. Knowing how flyposting tends to blight already run-down and poor areas, I should think the mild inconvenience of the odd &#8220;blucast&#8221; message is quite a bit preferable to having your environment trashed with old posters (which become litter). Expecially as you can simply change your phone&#8217;s name, or just block the sender. But yes, it&#8217;s still spamming, blah blah&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

