<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still Waiting For Mobile Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/03/20/still-waiting-for-mobile-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/03/20/still-waiting-for-mobile-advertising/</link>
	<description>Russell Buckley and Carlo Longino on mobile technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 09:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Brooks</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/03/20/still-waiting-for-mobile-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-7190</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 03:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/03/20/still-waiting-for-mobile-advertising/#comment-7190</guid>
		<description>My company has been doing ad-supported mobile content for a few years now. We originally started with a service called mfaith (http://mfaith.com) that sends a daily verse to subscribers phones. With the revenue cut the carriers take, we believe the ad-supported model is the better way to go. It opens up a great ad vehicle for brands that want to target certain demographic markets, and gives the subscribers the content for free which is what they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My company has been doing ad-supported mobile content for a few years now. We originally started with a service called mfaith (<a href="http://mfaith.com" rel="nofollow">http://mfaith.com</a>) that sends a daily verse to subscribers phones. With the revenue cut the carriers take, we believe the ad-supported model is the better way to go. It opens up a great ad vehicle for brands that want to target certain demographic markets, and gives the subscribers the content for free which is what they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/03/20/still-waiting-for-mobile-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-2961</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/03/20/still-waiting-for-mobile-advertising/#comment-2961</guid>
		<description>Interesting points, Carlo.  To be fair, however, the assumptions and conclusions from the KPMG report and your own observations create more questions than answers...

Let&#039;s get to the point:

Advertising: Yes, it will play a role in mobile content. It&#039;s a fundamental business component for almost every media type that I can think of.

Free/Full Priced: It&#039;s not black or white.  Price elasticity is alive and well. It&#039;s up to content publishers and content distributors to find out what the right mix is.  Both will take a hit on profits in the short-term for the sake of mid-term sustainability.

40/60: A desperate study... When are these companies going to stop charging people so much money for worthless results?  The fact is, some people are willing to pay and some people aren&#039;t.  It&#039;s a simple supply/demand curve.  Thankfully, consumers didn&#039;t stop using or dismissing the Internet when opinions were at a similar point. Or BMWs. Or Pepsi. Or...

Service/Churn:  Well, I suppose that we&#039;ll need to read the study to understand which 50% was right...  And contrary to what you stated, operators are willing to &quot;eat the costs&quot; of content as a marketing expense in the short-term for mid-term content business. Their goal? As you finally concluded:  Boost revenue. That&#039;s the point of business, or?

And finally, the point which we&#039;ve somehow... mutually agreed upon...

Revenue Boost:  It&#039;s plausible and even likely . Monetizing content from its value to advertisers is how the world works. Content attracts eyeballs and eyeballs attract advertisers. Mobile operators can (and are) getting their heads around it and particpating... let&#039;s hope that they continue to do so that we don&#039;t have to go through the &quot;net neutrality&quot; discussion with them if they find that they&#039;ve missed it like the fixed-line operators did.

To suggest an ammendment to your closing statement:

&quot;Content [and bandwidth] doesn‚Äôt [always] have to be free, either, but users don‚Äôt always have to be the ones paying the [entire] bill.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting points, Carlo.  To be fair, however, the assumptions and conclusions from the KPMG report and your own observations create more questions than answers&#8230;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get to the point:</p>
<p>Advertising: Yes, it will play a role in mobile content. It&#8217;s a fundamental business component for almost every media type that I can think of.</p>
<p>Free/Full Priced: It&#8217;s not black or white.  Price elasticity is alive and well. It&#8217;s up to content publishers and content distributors to find out what the right mix is.  Both will take a hit on profits in the short-term for the sake of mid-term sustainability.</p>
<p>40/60: A desperate study&#8230; When are these companies going to stop charging people so much money for worthless results?  The fact is, some people are willing to pay and some people aren&#8217;t.  It&#8217;s a simple supply/demand curve.  Thankfully, consumers didn&#8217;t stop using or dismissing the Internet when opinions were at a similar point. Or BMWs. Or Pepsi. Or&#8230;</p>
<p>Service/Churn:  Well, I suppose that we&#8217;ll need to read the study to understand which 50% was right&#8230;  And contrary to what you stated, operators are willing to &#8220;eat the costs&#8221; of content as a marketing expense in the short-term for mid-term content business. Their goal? As you finally concluded:  Boost revenue. That&#8217;s the point of business, or?</p>
<p>And finally, the point which we&#8217;ve somehow&#8230; mutually agreed upon&#8230;</p>
<p>Revenue Boost:  It&#8217;s plausible and even likely . Monetizing content from its value to advertisers is how the world works. Content attracts eyeballs and eyeballs attract advertisers. Mobile operators can (and are) getting their heads around it and particpating&#8230; let&#8217;s hope that they continue to do so that we don&#8217;t have to go through the &#8220;net neutrality&#8221; discussion with them if they find that they&#8217;ve missed it like the fixed-line operators did.</p>
<p>To suggest an ammendment to your closing statement:</p>
<p>&#8220;Content [and bandwidth] doesn‚Äôt [always] have to be free, either, but users don‚Äôt always have to be the ones paying the [entire] bill.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let's J*A*M</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/03/20/still-waiting-for-mobile-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-2896</link>
		<dc:creator>Let's J*A*M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/03/20/still-waiting-for-mobile-advertising/#comment-2896</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Le secteur Telecom va encore bouger...&lt;/strong&gt;

Beaucoup d&#039;agitation dans les Telecoms en ce moment. Le prix est toujours au centre des d?©bats et c&#039;est Bruxelles qui pousse ?† plus de concurrence sur les tarifs telecom. Elle s&#039;attaque en ce moment ?† faire baisser le co?ªt du SMS car il ressort....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Le secteur Telecom va encore bouger&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Beaucoup d&#8217;agitation dans les Telecoms en ce moment. Le prix est toujours au centre des d?©bats et c&#8217;est Bruxelles qui pousse ?† plus de concurrence sur les tarifs telecom. Elle s&#8217;attaque en ce moment ?† faire baisser le co?ªt du SMS car il ressort&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adverblog</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/03/20/still-waiting-for-mobile-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-2454</link>
		<dc:creator>Adverblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/03/20/still-waiting-for-mobile-advertising/#comment-2454</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;How evolved is mobile marketing in the US?...&lt;/strong&gt;

On ClickZ, Laura Marriott tries to find out whether North America is ahead or behind Europe when it comes to mobile marketing. It a quite interesting article to realize the differences among the two continents, and understand the solutions (not......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>How evolved is mobile marketing in the US?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>On ClickZ, Laura Marriott tries to find out whether North America is ahead or behind Europe when it comes to mobile marketing. It a quite interesting article to realize the differences among the two continents, and understand the solutions (not&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobilitee</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/03/20/still-waiting-for-mobile-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-2451</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobilitee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/03/20/still-waiting-for-mobile-advertising/#comment-2451</guid>
		<description>[...] Carlo at Mobhappy posted about the lack of a way to provide enhanced mobile content and features without charging. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Carlo at Mobhappy posted about the lack of a way to provide enhanced mobile content and features without charging. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich LaBarca</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/03/20/still-waiting-for-mobile-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich LaBarca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2006/03/20/still-waiting-for-mobile-advertising/#comment-2450</guid>
		<description>Carlo.  My company Tomo Software is working on a solution for ad-supported mobile applications.  We think that we address many of the needs you present here.  

If you or others are interested, we are looking for initial trial members and partners.  So feel free to contact me at rich at  mobilitee.org or use the contact information at www.tomosoftware.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlo.  My company Tomo Software is working on a solution for ad-supported mobile applications.  We think that we address many of the needs you present here.  </p>
<p>If you or others are interested, we are looking for initial trial members and partners.  So feel free to contact me at rich at  mobilitee.org or use the contact information at <a href="http://www.tomosoftware.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomosoftware.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

