<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile UI Trends: Is More Better?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/04/06/mobile-ui-trends-is-more-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/04/06/mobile-ui-trends-is-more-better/</link>
	<description>Russell Buckley and Carlo Longino on mobile technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 09:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quicklinks 10.04.07 &#124; Connected Internet</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/04/06/mobile-ui-trends-is-more-better/comment-page-1/#comment-101836</link>
		<dc:creator>Quicklinks 10.04.07 &#124; Connected Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/04/06/mobile-ui-trends-is-more-better/#comment-101836</guid>
		<description>[...] Mobile UI Trends: Is More Better? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mobile UI Trends: Is More Better? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small Surfaces - More is less</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/04/06/mobile-ui-trends-is-more-better/comment-page-1/#comment-101762</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Surfaces - More is less</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/04/06/mobile-ui-trends-is-more-better/#comment-101762</guid>
		<description>[...] Link: Mobile UI Trends: Is More Better? (mobhappy.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link: Mobile UI Trends: Is More Better? (mobhappy.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/04/06/mobile-ui-trends-is-more-better/comment-page-1/#comment-101761</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/04/06/mobile-ui-trends-is-more-better/#comment-101761</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used mobile sites on cell phones and blackberrys, and really, I believe the real issue with mobile websites is they don&#039;t &#039;get it&#039;.

They either try to make the site &#039;fit seemlessly&#039; into their design/branding concept and waste time (downloading, scrolling) thus irritating the user, or they try to go so simple, it has little to no practical use (obvious exceptions aside - if you&#039;re looking for flight times, it&#039;s a small simple form).

In either case, it seems it&#039;s very rare for sites to make a version for smaller devices, and when they do, it&#039;s more of a side project they hand off to the new guy - who&#039;s got a hot date with the receptionist in 3 hours.

It&#039;s not that hard to design a site for a mobile device, nor hard to get a website to check their browser.

I believe it really boils down to lack of effort - implying a perceived lack of market - regardless of what the talking head CEOs and Marketing folk say in zines.  The effort is not being spent on this - by the content providers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used mobile sites on cell phones and blackberrys, and really, I believe the real issue with mobile websites is they don&#8217;t &#8216;get it&#8217;.</p>
<p>They either try to make the site &#8216;fit seemlessly&#8217; into their design/branding concept and waste time (downloading, scrolling) thus irritating the user, or they try to go so simple, it has little to no practical use (obvious exceptions aside &#8211; if you&#8217;re looking for flight times, it&#8217;s a small simple form).</p>
<p>In either case, it seems it&#8217;s very rare for sites to make a version for smaller devices, and when they do, it&#8217;s more of a side project they hand off to the new guy &#8211; who&#8217;s got a hot date with the receptionist in 3 hours.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that hard to design a site for a mobile device, nor hard to get a website to check their browser.</p>
<p>I believe it really boils down to lack of effort &#8211; implying a perceived lack of market &#8211; regardless of what the talking head CEOs and Marketing folk say in zines.  The effort is not being spent on this &#8211; by the content providers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick Links: 10/04/07 &#124; Connected Internet</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/04/06/mobile-ui-trends-is-more-better/comment-page-1/#comment-101727</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick Links: 10/04/07 &#124; Connected Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/04/06/mobile-ui-trends-is-more-better/#comment-101727</guid>
		<description>[...] Mobile UI Trends: Is More Better? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mobile UI Trends: Is More Better? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Always On Real-Time Access &#187; Carnival of the Mobilists #68</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/04/06/mobile-ui-trends-is-more-better/comment-page-1/#comment-101718</link>
		<dc:creator>Always On Real-Time Access &#187; Carnival of the Mobilists #68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 14:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/04/06/mobile-ui-trends-is-more-better/#comment-101718</guid>
		<description>[...] CTIA saw the arrival of Zenzui and Deepfish, both from Microsoft. Carlo Longino at MobHappy ponders - ‚ÄúMobile UI Trends: Is More Better?‚Äù [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CTIA saw the arrival of Zenzui and Deepfish, both from Microsoft. Carlo Longino at MobHappy ponders &#8211; ‚ÄúMobile UI Trends: Is More Better?‚Äù [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel Chandler - Mosio</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/04/06/mobile-ui-trends-is-more-better/comment-page-1/#comment-101694</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel Chandler - Mosio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 16:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/04/06/mobile-ui-trends-is-more-better/#comment-101694</guid>
		<description>I agree that the notion a small screen can&#039;t be affective is completely false. I&#039;ve too been frustrated, but it&#039;s mostly in cases where people are trying to simply put a mini-website onto the phone screen. Immediately affective or not, these two little projects are part of the evolution of the mobile web. Exciting stuff if you ask me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the notion a small screen can&#8217;t be affective is completely false. I&#8217;ve too been frustrated, but it&#8217;s mostly in cases where people are trying to simply put a mini-website onto the phone screen. Immediately affective or not, these two little projects are part of the evolution of the mobile web. Exciting stuff if you ask me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FJ!!</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/04/06/mobile-ui-trends-is-more-better/comment-page-1/#comment-101668</link>
		<dc:creator>FJ!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 00:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2007/04/06/mobile-ui-trends-is-more-better/#comment-101668</guid>
		<description>You know, a search for zoomable interface in the ACM digital library will serve up a number of academic papers to show that they actually are not good UIs to allow a user to perform a simple task. They are worse, IIRC, that fish-eye interfaces, and those do not do much better than just panning anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, a search for zoomable interface in the ACM digital library will serve up a number of academic papers to show that they actually are not good UIs to allow a user to perform a simple task. They are worse, IIRC, that fish-eye interfaces, and those do not do much better than just panning anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

