<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo! Gets Vocal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/04/03/yahoo-gets-vocal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/04/03/yahoo-gets-vocal/</link>
	<description>Russell Buckley and Carlo Longino on mobile technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 09:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aneesh</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/04/03/yahoo-gets-vocal/comment-page-1/#comment-119758</link>
		<dc:creator>Aneesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 10:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/04/03/yahoo-gets-vocal/#comment-119758</guid>
		<description>Since almost a decade , techies have ben trying to devise the best speech recongition system. Not yet heard or expreinced which can be cusotmised to local level. At times even the anbience noice is picked up and taken as input by the best of the IVR systems available.  

Though voice will open up many aveneus but we are still far from making it a product that can be used practically. But I still feel that voice has immense potentioal in merging markets. 

Even telcos who are struggling to retain their voice ARPU and increase their MOUs on the network are eager to support any such solution if devised. 

Yahoo need to find out better way of delivering product to the user isntead of blindly copying what the competition is doing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since almost a decade , techies have ben trying to devise the best speech recongition system. Not yet heard or expreinced which can be cusotmised to local level. At times even the anbience noice is picked up and taken as input by the best of the IVR systems available.  </p>
<p>Though voice will open up many aveneus but we are still far from making it a product that can be used practically. But I still feel that voice has immense potentioal in merging markets. </p>
<p>Even telcos who are struggling to retain their voice ARPU and increase their MOUs on the network are eager to support any such solution if devised. </p>
<p>Yahoo need to find out better way of delivering product to the user isntead of blindly copying what the competition is doing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giff Gfroerer, i2SMS</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/04/03/yahoo-gets-vocal/comment-page-1/#comment-119301</link>
		<dc:creator>Giff Gfroerer, i2SMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/04/03/yahoo-gets-vocal/#comment-119301</guid>
		<description>Texting is absolutely faster and more accurate then IVR systems.  Once you get used to texting, especially with T9, it is the only way you will want to go...and this comes someone over 30.  

A few years back I rarely texted.  Now it is a daily practice.  Remember, texting is as addictive as cigarette smoking.  Once you get the hang of it, it is the preferred method of communication, whether it be SMS, web email, or tapping an address into a browser.

Voice recognition systems are nice, but also extremely frustrating.  How many times have you yelled back at an IVR system &quot;NO, I SAID ACCOUNT BALANCE&quot; and finally gave up and hit the &quot;0&quot; button to be connected to the operator.  With text, this is not a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texting is absolutely faster and more accurate then IVR systems.  Once you get used to texting, especially with T9, it is the only way you will want to go&#8230;and this comes someone over 30.  </p>
<p>A few years back I rarely texted.  Now it is a daily practice.  Remember, texting is as addictive as cigarette smoking.  Once you get the hang of it, it is the preferred method of communication, whether it be SMS, web email, or tapping an address into a browser.</p>
<p>Voice recognition systems are nice, but also extremely frustrating.  How many times have you yelled back at an IVR system &#8220;NO, I SAID ACCOUNT BALANCE&#8221; and finally gave up and hit the &#8220;0&#8243; button to be connected to the operator.  With text, this is not a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlo Longino</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/04/03/yahoo-gets-vocal/comment-page-1/#comment-119292</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo Longino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/04/03/yahoo-gets-vocal/#comment-119292</guid>
		<description>Heh, I had a draft of &quot;Random Thoughts from CTIA&quot; that included this bit:

&quot;Is voice recognition for mobile devices a US-only phenomenon, driven by our car-centric culture? Seen the usual hype around it this week, but it still doesn&#039;t resonate with me. I can&#039;t imagine walking down the street, barking commands at my phone, or dictating texts in public. Part of the attraction of mobile is the discretion it allows.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, I had a draft of &#8220;Random Thoughts from CTIA&#8221; that included this bit:</p>
<p>&#8220;Is voice recognition for mobile devices a US-only phenomenon, driven by our car-centric culture? Seen the usual hype around it this week, but it still doesn&#8217;t resonate with me. I can&#8217;t imagine walking down the street, barking commands at my phone, or dictating texts in public. Part of the attraction of mobile is the discretion it allows.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Buckley</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/04/03/yahoo-gets-vocal/comment-page-1/#comment-119290</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Buckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/04/03/yahoo-gets-vocal/#comment-119290</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments.

Good point about Spinvox Alfie. I was thinking about how they fitted in when I was writing and forgot to mention them. If you&#039;re not not from these parts, Spinvox translates voice mail into an sms. However, it&#039;s a little different, as while it is using voice, it&#039;s self-selecting as the person leaving the message has already decided to leave a voice message. But agree it&#039;s a great idea.

James - let&#039;s just think about this, for fun. We&#039;ve been using our hands as tools (opposable thumb and all that) far, far longer than we have been using speech.  While the estimates vary, tool-using has been going on for about 6 million years (when we diverged from chimpanzees) and maybe a long time before. Whereas speech started between 10,000 and 100,000 years ago.

So we&#039;re actually &quot;programmed&quot; longer and far more thoroughly to use our hands.

Either way, I actually think that some other inputting technology will come in and change everything and both voice and keyboards will be curiosities. Something like direct brain commands, a way of moving your jaw or waving the handset in a Wii-like way.

Watch this space.

Russell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments.</p>
<p>Good point about Spinvox Alfie. I was thinking about how they fitted in when I was writing and forgot to mention them. If you&#8217;re not not from these parts, Spinvox translates voice mail into an sms. However, it&#8217;s a little different, as while it is using voice, it&#8217;s self-selecting as the person leaving the message has already decided to leave a voice message. But agree it&#8217;s a great idea.</p>
<p>James &#8211; let&#8217;s just think about this, for fun. We&#8217;ve been using our hands as tools (opposable thumb and all that) far, far longer than we have been using speech.  While the estimates vary, tool-using has been going on for about 6 million years (when we diverged from chimpanzees) and maybe a long time before. Whereas speech started between 10,000 and 100,000 years ago.</p>
<p>So we&#8217;re actually &#8220;programmed&#8221; longer and far more thoroughly to use our hands.</p>
<p>Either way, I actually think that some other inputting technology will come in and change everything and both voice and keyboards will be curiosities. Something like direct brain commands, a way of moving your jaw or waving the handset in a Wii-like way.</p>
<p>Watch this space.</p>
<p>Russell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Pearce</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/04/03/yahoo-gets-vocal/comment-page-1/#comment-119287</link>
		<dc:creator>James Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/04/03/yahoo-gets-vocal/#comment-119287</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t agree.

As animals we&#039;re not programmed to type, we&#039;re programmed to speak. Millions of years of evolution thwarted by this decade&#039;s crappy speech recognition? I don&#039;t think so.

Yeah, yeah, it&#039;s Jetsons stuff, talking into your watch to interact with others and pull up information. But it&#039;s obvious that&#039;s how the mobile experience is going to end up being.

That curious Generation Y of dudes that learnt to type quickly on little keyboards should become a strange anomaly, in the grand scheme of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t agree.</p>
<p>As animals we&#8217;re not programmed to type, we&#8217;re programmed to speak. Millions of years of evolution thwarted by this decade&#8217;s crappy speech recognition? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>Yeah, yeah, it&#8217;s Jetsons stuff, talking into your watch to interact with others and pull up information. But it&#8217;s obvious that&#8217;s how the mobile experience is going to end up being.</p>
<p>That curious Generation Y of dudes that learnt to type quickly on little keyboards should become a strange anomaly, in the grand scheme of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alfie</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/04/03/yahoo-gets-vocal/comment-page-1/#comment-119286</link>
		<dc:creator>alfie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/04/03/yahoo-gets-vocal/#comment-119286</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have to agree (being over 30, heh), voice commands jsut arent *currently* that pragmatic. 

Once mobile devices are an order of magnitude more intelligent and integrated (read: embedded) on the HCI level then I *do* think voice (sub vocalisation) will be the key input/output medium, but we&#039;re talking at least 10 years away.

Voice to text on the other hand is right now both pragmatic and has all sorts of easy to implement bottom line saving functions, hence for examples Spinvox&#039;s extraordinary success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to agree (being over 30, heh), voice commands jsut arent *currently* that pragmatic. </p>
<p>Once mobile devices are an order of magnitude more intelligent and integrated (read: embedded) on the HCI level then I *do* think voice (sub vocalisation) will be the key input/output medium, but we&#8217;re talking at least 10 years away.</p>
<p>Voice to text on the other hand is right now both pragmatic and has all sorts of easy to implement bottom line saving functions, hence for examples Spinvox&#8217;s extraordinary success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

