<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MobHappy &#187; p2p sms advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mobhappy.com/blog1/tag/p2p-sms-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1</link>
	<description>Russell Buckley and Carlo Longino on mobile technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:18:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Will Peer-to-Peer SMS Advertising be Huge?</title>
		<link>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/09/11/will-peer-to-peer-sms-advertising-be-huge/</link>
		<comments>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/09/11/will-peer-to-peer-sms-advertising-be-huge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russell Buckley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p sms advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobhappy.com/blog1/?p=2883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[P2P SMS is clearly a huge market &#8211; nothing new there. According to Wikipedia, there were around 500 Billion sent worldwide back in 2004 and based on what&#8217;s happened in the UK since then, I think it&#8217;s reasonable to assume that today, it&#8217;s about 1,000 Billion. The sheer numbers involved have got many companies (mainly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P2P SMS is clearly a huge market &#8211; nothing new there. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text_messaging#Popularity">According to Wikipedia</a>, there were around 500 Billion sent worldwide back in 2004 and based on what&#8217;s happened in the UK since then, I think it&#8217;s reasonable to assume that today, it&#8217;s about 1,000 Billion.</p>
<p>The sheer numbers involved have got many companies (mainly operators and vendors) salivating about the potential for ad-funded P2P sms. The idea goes that if an advertisement were to be inserted into every sms sent, they&#8217;ll be as rich as a very rich thing on Planet Rich.</p>
<p>So I thought it would be worth exploring, as a concept to see if there&#8217;s any real market here.</p>
<p>The main issue is the business model itself. If operators suddenly started inserting ads, I think there would be a backlash from consumers, unless there was some kind of value exchange. In other words, the sms would need to be reduced in price &#8211; or even offered free. Let&#8217;s assume that an sms currently costs about US 10 cents to send &#8211; and I appreciate that this is a huge generalisation, but it&#8217;ll do as a round figure. In that case, to replace that revenue, the operator would have to charge $100 in advertising, for every 1,000 they send out. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how attractive such advertising would be to potential advertisers, but let&#8217;s assume for a moment that it will be no more or less attractive than say, mobile web advertising. Actually, I doubt it would be, but let&#8217;s leave that for the moment. I&#8217;d say a very good rate for mobile web ads would be $25 per 1,000 ads (CPM) served, so you can quickly see that in order to make the same money that they do today, they&#8217;d have to sell ads at 4 times the current prevalent rate. So free is hard to make work.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget that all this does is actually replace one source of income for another &#8211; there&#8217;s no guarantee that sms is price sensitive and that a free or discounted rate would result in greater volumes and thus more advertising and in turn, incremental revenues. So what the operators would have to do would be to ditch a highly effective, proven and highly profitable model, for one that is unproven and pure speculation, as well as one with no incremental upside. Hmmm &#8211; this isn&#8217;t a likely scenario, wouldn&#8217;t you say?</p>
<p>There are other considerations around this whole area, such as how the user experience works, but they seem to be largely academic if the fundamental business model doesn&#8217;t make sense. There may also be other workable business models in the sms area, such as sponsorship of sms alerts, although I&#8217;d speculate that this sector will start to decline at some point.</p>
<p>Naturally, I may well be missing something with this brief analysis, so please shed light if there is light to be shed. But I would suggest that the people talking this up haven&#8217;t thought it through too much, having been blinded by the very big numbers at the top of the page. And big numbers don&#8217;t automatically lead to big incremental revenues. After all, there are <a href="http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_flies_are_there_in_the_world">apparently 17 quadrillion flies</a> in this world &#8211; or roughly 17,000 times as many flies as sms sent, if my maths is right &#8211; so all we need to do is charge a cent for every one of them and hey &#8211; bingo! I wonder why no one thought of that before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mobhappy.com/blog1/2008/09/11/will-peer-to-peer-sms-advertising-be-huge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

